Erin Pearce vs Ciara Moore Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Second Serve Performance: Pearce has excelled on second serves in the last 6 months, winning 47.17% of points, compared to Moore's 40.59%. Does this give Pearce an edge overall? Yes, as there's a strong link between second serve points won and match outcomes.
• Return Game: Pearce shows better form, capturing 55.17% of opponent's second serve points versus Moore's 50.88%. For first serves, Pearce takes a significant lead with 40.52% over Moore's 28.14%. Could this be crucial? Certainly, as higher returns improve match predictions.
• Under Pressure: Facing breakpoints, Pearce excels with a 64.29% save rate, outperforming Moore's 43.86%. Will this impact betting strategies? Yes, it directly affects in-game confidence and resilience.
• Overall Performance: In the past year, Moore outperformed Pearce, achieving a 39.13% win rate compared to Pearce's 18.18%. Does recent match history indicate a likely winner? Moore seems stronger based on win percentages.
• Preferred Surface: Pearce's best surface is Hard, winning 18%, while Moore excels on Clay with a 40% win rate. Which surface gives a player the upper hand? Neither specializes particularly on the dominant surface for this matchup.
• Player Level: Pearce often competes at higher-level Challengers tournaments ($10K+) with a 25% win rate, whereas Moore plays at Futures level with a 46.15% win rate. Does playing at higher levels benefit Pearce? Possibly, although Moore’s consistency at their level is notable.
• Opponent Quality: Pearce has faced slightly tougher competition, playing opponents ranked on average at 222.18 compared to Moore's 260.04. How does this shape predictions? It suggests Pearce is more seasoned against stronger opponents.
• Deciding Sets: In deciding sets, Pearce has a 13% win rate over the past year, while Moore has yet to win one. Is Pearce favored in long matches? Yes, slightly, if the match extends.
• Break Point Conversion: Recently, Moore has a slight advantage, converting 39.47% of break points, whereas Pearce has converted 36.84%. How does this affect the match? Marginally in Moore’s favor for crucial points.

Editorial Prediction (July 13, 2025, UTC):

Analyzing both players’ strengths and weaknesses, Pearce consistently outshines Moore in crucial aspects like second serve performance and return games. These stats are pivotal for match success.

However, Moore displays a better overall performance over the past year, securing more victories and showing adaptability across various tournaments, reflecting possibly advantageous momentum.

While Pearce demonstrates resilience under pressure, Moore's higher conversion of break points suggests a knack for capitalizing on chances to shift match dynamics.

Considering all statistical evidence, Moore's broader tournament success and effective breakpoint management hint at a narrow edge in their upcoming tennis match.

Therefore, Moore is most likely to emerge victorious in this upcoming encounter.